<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Solutions For HR	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/</link>
	<description>Protecting you and your business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on In what circumstances would an employee not qualify for ssp? by Marek		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-766</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://95.142.155.121/~solutionsforhrco/?p=303#comment-766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,
My employer informed me that I have to self-isolate for 10 days, I lost many hours at work which means,no money earn.I didn&#039;t receive SSP,nothing.My net payment on 8 February £823.Next salary after 4 weeks time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
My employer informed me that I have to self-isolate for 10 days, I lost many hours at work which means,no money earn.I didn&#8217;t receive SSP,nothing.My net payment on 8 February £823.Next salary after 4 weeks time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on In what circumstances would an employee not qualify for ssp? by Solutions for HR		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solutions for HR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 10:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://95.142.155.121/~solutionsforhrco/?p=303#comment-732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-723&quot;&gt;Vicky&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your question, Vicky.

There are a number of factors that will affect whether you receive SSP.

Have you tried using the online calculator on Gov.UK as this will help you identify eligibility?

Just click &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gov.uk/calculate-statutory-sick-pay&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Calculate your employee’s statutory sick pay&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-723">Vicky</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your question, Vicky.</p>
<p>There are a number of factors that will affect whether you receive SSP.</p>
<p>Have you tried using the online calculator on Gov.UK as this will help you identify eligibility?</p>
<p>Just click <a href="https://www.gov.uk/calculate-statutory-sick-pay" rel="nofollow ugc">Calculate your employee’s statutory sick pay</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on In what circumstances would an employee not qualify for ssp? by Vicky		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 22:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://95.142.155.121/~solutionsforhrco/?p=303#comment-723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi I have been told I’m not entitled to ssp as my work have taken the last 8 weeks pay from the start of my sick line(23rd). And not the first day taken ill (taken to hospital17th) so when calculating my average wage over 8 week I only have 7 weeks paid work. They are saying this is correct. I can’t find a definitive answer online. Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I have been told I’m not entitled to ssp as my work have taken the last 8 weeks pay from the start of my sick line(23rd). And not the first day taken ill (taken to hospital17th) so when calculating my average wage over 8 week I only have 7 weeks paid work. They are saying this is correct. I can’t find a definitive answer online. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Can we cut sick pay for unvaccinated staff? by Solutions for HR		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2021/10/29/can-we-cut-sick-pay-for-unvaccinated-staff/#comment-636</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solutions for HR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 14:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/?p=3838#comment-636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2021/10/29/can-we-cut-sick-pay-for-unvaccinated-staff/#comment-634&quot;&gt;Paul Tomlinson&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your question, Paul.

As long as you have it covered in your GDPR privacy notice and can justify a legitimate interest and have done an impact assessment then you are being clear and open on your reasons for doing so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2021/10/29/can-we-cut-sick-pay-for-unvaccinated-staff/#comment-634">Paul Tomlinson</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your question, Paul.</p>
<p>As long as you have it covered in your GDPR privacy notice and can justify a legitimate interest and have done an impact assessment then you are being clear and open on your reasons for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Can we cut sick pay for unvaccinated staff? by Paul Tomlinson		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2021/10/29/can-we-cut-sick-pay-for-unvaccinated-staff/#comment-634</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Tomlinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 08:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/?p=3838#comment-634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am intrigued to know how Morrison&#039;s is able to identify staff who have not been vaccinated? I wasn&#039;t aware that you could even ask this question so for them to have collated this knowledge they must already be breaching their employees rights surely?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am intrigued to know how Morrison&#8217;s is able to identify staff who have not been vaccinated? I wasn&#8217;t aware that you could even ask this question so for them to have collated this knowledge they must already be breaching their employees rights surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Uber loses employment status battle in the Supreme Court by Solutions for HR		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2021/02/20/uber-loses-employment-status-battle-in-the-supreme-court/#comment-501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solutions for HR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/?p=3730#comment-501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2021/02/20/uber-loses-employment-status-battle-in-the-supreme-court/#comment-500&quot;&gt;James Hope&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your question, James.

Worker status is that &quot;middle ground&quot; between self-employed and employee. The Uber drivers were found to be Workers because of their working relationship with Uber. I would definitely recommend a written contract although what&#039;s written in the contract should reflect what happens in practice as otherwise, it&#039;s not worth the paper it is written on!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2021/02/20/uber-loses-employment-status-battle-in-the-supreme-court/#comment-500">James Hope</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your question, James.</p>
<p>Worker status is that &#8220;middle ground&#8221; between self-employed and employee. The Uber drivers were found to be Workers because of their working relationship with Uber. I would definitely recommend a written contract although what&#8217;s written in the contract should reflect what happens in practice as otherwise, it&#8217;s not worth the paper it is written on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Uber loses employment status battle in the Supreme Court by James Hope		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2021/02/20/uber-loses-employment-status-battle-in-the-supreme-court/#comment-500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/?p=3730#comment-500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is it possible for an employer and an employee to agree to worker status in a written contract. 
Is there any difference between that a zero hour contract.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible for an employer and an employee to agree to worker status in a written contract.<br />
Is there any difference between that a zero hour contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on In what circumstances would an employee not qualify for ssp? by Solutions for HR		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solutions for HR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 12:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://95.142.155.121/~solutionsforhrco/?p=303#comment-436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-435&quot;&gt;Jo&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your question.

Sorry I couldn&#039;t tell properly from your comment which period came first.

If it was the first in March to June then the second in July to November then these are linked.

If it was the other way round they are more than 8 weeks apart so not linked.

This would mean SSP would start again for the second period.

Hope this helps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-435">Jo</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your question.</p>
<p>Sorry I couldn&#8217;t tell properly from your comment which period came first.</p>
<p>If it was the first in March to June then the second in July to November then these are linked.</p>
<p>If it was the other way round they are more than 8 weeks apart so not linked.</p>
<p>This would mean SSP would start again for the second period.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on In what circumstances would an employee not qualify for ssp? by Jo		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 04:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://95.142.155.121/~solutionsforhrco/?p=303#comment-435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi I have two linked periods of sick. Back trouble 
One in July to November
And one  March to June
Does the ssp start again on the second period ?
Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I have two linked periods of sick. Back trouble<br />
One in July to November<br />
And one  March to June<br />
Does the ssp start again on the second period ?<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on In what circumstances would an employee not qualify for ssp? by Solutions for HR		</title>
		<link>https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solutions for HR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://95.142.155.121/~solutionsforhrco/?p=303#comment-433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-432&quot;&gt;Tracey&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Tracey

Thanks for your question.

Entitlement to SSP is decided by applying the qualifying conditions to the first day on the first PIW, not the start of any later linked PIW, so providing you qualified for the first absence, you will for any further linked absences.

Hope this helps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solutionsforhr.co.uk/2018/02/09/in-what-circumstances-would-an-employee-not-qualify-for-ssp/#comment-432">Tracey</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Tracey</p>
<p>Thanks for your question.</p>
<p>Entitlement to SSP is decided by applying the qualifying conditions to the first day on the first PIW, not the start of any later linked PIW, so providing you qualified for the first absence, you will for any further linked absences.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
