In Brazel v Harpur Trust (UKEAT/0102/17), the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that holiday pay for a zero hours term-time only worker cannot be capped at 12.07% of annual earnings

The school calculated holiday pay pro rata to the proportion of the year worked, paying 12.07% of a term’s pay (i.e. 5.6 weeks’ holiday divided by the standard working year of 46.4 weeks).

The EAT held that this approach was wrong as on a working ‘year’ of 32-35 weeks, the effect of this was that holiday pay came out lower than if calculated on the basis set out in s224 ERA, taking a 12-week average of pay from weeks actually worked, and ignoring the out-of-term weeks.

The EAT held that basing holiday pay on the 12-week average was the correct approach.

The effect of the 12-week average approach is that holiday pay as a percentage of annual earnings for a part-timer on a 32-week ‘year’ would be 46.4/32 x 12.07% = 17.5%, giving proportionately more holiday pay than a worker working throughout the year getting 5.6 weeks paid leave.

The EAT noted that part-timers are entitled to be treated no less favourably than full-time workers although noted that this judgment would be of importance for schools and other educational establishments, as well as employers who pay rolled-up holiday pay to employees with no set working hours.

Stay in the know

We’ll keep you up to date with all the latest in employment law and HR. You can unsubscribe at any time.